That is a very sensitive subject. To a certian degree I would say trust people. But some people do not deserve to be trusted, after they have soon that they can not be trusted. At which point I would think Scropion would remove them. But if Scropion wants some way of tracking people and some speficics of how much they make and how much goes to charities, then I would think their would be some private way of doing it. And their should be a commity that can be trusted with sensitive information, to keep their mouths shut, and not to use that information improbrly. And the only people who see the information are those on the commity and the person submitting it. But if it gets to that point how do we know what they are submitting is true. The digital age has made some things very nice today, but it has also made some things harder, such as knowing what someone states is true or not, it is easer to make fake edavance. For the most part my vote is trust people, if for some reason someone looks suspicous, have it taken care of very quitly with them and a trusted commity. Because sometimes even when they look quilty they are innicent, and I think care should be taken to protect the inicent from human fralities, such as judgments that come from someone being accused.
I think the only way to absultly know how much someone is making is to have a group account or have the passwords to their account. And I don't really like the idea of either, but it is up to scropion. Plus even if we know how much they make, do we really know how much they donated.
Anyways I am for trust, untill shown they can't handle it. After that how much effort should we put in past a looking into the matter. Such as if found quilty, do we or scropion still allow them access to the robot.
Steven
